A Systematic Study of the Structural and Magnetic Properties of Mn-, Co-, and Ni-Doped Colloidal Magnetite Nanoparticles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of colloidal M x Fe 3– x O 4 (M = Mn, Co, Ni; x = 0–1) nanoparticles with diameters ranging from 6.8 to 11.6 nm was synthesized by hydrothermal reaction in aqueous medium at low temperature (200 °C). Energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis and inductively coupled plasma spectrometry confirm that the actual elemental compositions agree well with the nominal ones. The structural properties of the obtained nanoparticles were investigated by powder X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, Mössbauer spectroscopy, X-ray and neutron pair distribution function analysis, and electron microscopy. The results demonstrate that our synthesis technique leads to the formation of chemically uniform single-phase solid solution nanoparticles with cubic spinel structure, confirming intrinsic doping. The local structure of the Fe 3 O 4 NPs is distorted with respect to the cubic inverse-spinel structure, while chemical substitution of Fe by Mn or Ni partially eliminates the local distortions. Magnetic studies showed that, in comparison to nondoped Fe 3 O 4, the saturation magnetization ( M s ) of M x Fe 3– x O 4 (M = Mn, Ni) decreases with increasing dopant concentration, while Co-doped samples showed similar M s . On the other hand, whereas Mn- and Ni-doped nanoparticles exhibit superparamagnetic behavior at room temperature, ferrimagnetism emerges for Co x Fe 3– x O 4 nanoparticles, which can be tuned by the level of Co doping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it