Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims to reconsider the education of the body, by referring to the phenomenological framework of Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1908-1961). Many interests in the body among educational studies have been given to changing bodies or improving performances as the education of “through the body.” On the other hand, works of the body, according to Merleau-Ponty’s framework, are the base of the experience of the world, which has already moved before a reflective subject thinks about world. If it is so, we can understand that these works of the body have been beyond our educational attempts or intentions. In this paper, I describe these works of the body, which provides a perspective to its education. To explain this perspective, I first consider the influences of Husserl to Merleau-Ponty, who expands and deepens the basic framework proposed by the Husserl’s phenomenology, especially about the idea of“ Lebenswelt” transforming to“ le monde vécu.” Second, I investigate the concept of “intercorporéité, ” which is regarded as a key concept in describing the experience of the world. In conclusion, I reconsider the education of the body by claiming the educational significance of the concept of “intercorporéité” and the phenomenological mode of thought in educational studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.043 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".