From Inert to Explosive, The Hydrolytic Reactivity of R−NSO Compounds Understood: A Computational Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a computational study on the concerted hydrolysis of several classes of N-sulfinylamines of generic formula R-N═S═O, such as the -amines themselves (R-NSO), -hydrazines (R-NH-NSO), -hydrazides (R-CO-NH-NSO) and -amides (R-CO-NSO), as these species are known to possess a wide range of hydrolytic reactivity. Two possible mechanisms of hydrolysis, with a water dimer across the S═O and N═S bonds, in the gas phase are investigated. The reactivity is discussed with respect to the electronic structures, established with the use of the quantum theory of Atoms in Molecules, Natural Bond Orbital and Natural Resonance Theory approaches. For the inert N-sulfinylhydrazines and the keto tautomers of N-sulfinylhydrazides, extended π-conjugation adds a sulfide-like resonance structure that is responsible for their insensitivity toward moisture. Activation barriers for hydrolysis, where water acts as a nucleophilic reagent, decrease with increasing positive charge on the NSO sulfur atom, a finding that might prove useful as a predictive tool in the determination of the general reactivity of an N-sulfinyl compound by experimentalists.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".