MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325208953 · doi:10.1144/0016-76492010-016

Sediment transport processes in an ancient mud-dominated succession: a comparison of processes operating in marine offshore settings and anoxic basinal environments

2011· article· en· W2325208953 on OpenAlexaff
Samer Ghadeer, J. H. S. Macquaker

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Geological Society · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyAnoxic watersEcological successionSubmarine pipelineSedimentSedimentary rockOceanographyPaleontologyGeochemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Few studies describe and compare the transport mechanisms operating to disperse mud in different parts of basins. Instead, the physical processes operating to disperse mud in offshore environments, where storm and tidal processes are interpreted to dominate, are generally considered in isolation from those occurring in basinal settings where changes in bottom-water anoxia and suspension settling from buoyant plumes are mostly interpreted to dominate. Using microtextural, mineralogical and geochemical data derived from the analyses of 151 thin sections obtained from the Lower Jurassic mudstone-dominated succession exposed on the coast of NE England, we investigate how varying sediment dispersal mechanisms, bioturbation and early diagenesis operated to produce the lithofacies variability observed. In particular, we consider the processes of sediment delivery while bottom waters were interpreted to be euxinic. Analyses of these samples reveal that the succession is highly variable at millimetre to centimetre scales. Six main lithofacies were observed: (1) sand- and clay-bearing, silt-rich mudstones; (2) silt-bearing, clay-rich mudstones; (3) clay-rich mudstones; (4) clay-, calcareous nannoplankton-, and organic carbon-bearing mudstones; (5) fine-grained muddy sandstones; (6) cement-rich mudstones. These units are organized typically into stacked successions of sharp-based, normally graded, thin (<10 mm) beds. Single beds exhibit a variety of sedimentary structures. Specifically tempestites, wave-enhanced sediment gravity flows of fluid mud, ripples and gutter casts are common in the coarser-grained mudstone facies. In contrast, thin siltstone lags, compacted ripples and organo-mineralic aggregates are common in the finer grained mudstone facies and those with significant primary production-derived components. Bioturbation is common throughout. These data indicate that sediment was transported by density flows and traction currents operating at the sediment–water interface in all parts of the studied succession. Bioturbation has overprinted depositional fabrics in the majority of samples. The extent to which persistent bottom-water anoxia and low-energy suspension settling influenced lithofacies variability in the basinal parts of the succession has been overstated; these environments were more dynamic than most researchers have previously concluded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations88
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Geological SocietySame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207