MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325211337 · doi:10.1093/jahist/jas662

The Papers of James Madison, Presidential Series

2013· article· en· W2325211337 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kevin R. C. Gutzman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of American History · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresidencyPoliticsPresidential systemPower (physics)FrontierHistoryLawPolitical scienceHistoriographyDiplomacyEconomic history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The last months of 1813 and first half of 1814 saw the Madison presidency and the War of 1812 continue their downward trajectory. First the U.S. Army's ill-led efforts on the Canadian frontier ground to a halt, and then Napoleon I's unanticipated fall from power freed up Britain's enormous military resources to be focused on the American war—if the British wanted them to be. President James Madison held out hope that the sudden disappearance of the French Empire's continental system, and the associated reopening of European trade with America, would give Britain's allies strong incentives to push Britannia toward a peaceful resolution of its nagging American fight. Still, he recognized at least verbally that Britain might push the conflict to a punishing conclusion. This volume of Madison papers once again makes clear how substantially the historiography of the early republic stands to benefit from this documentary project. Previously, much of Madison's outgoing and virtually none of his incoming correspondence had been published, but now scholars will have readily available documentation of many of the types of concerns that demanded the president's, or at least his aides', attention on a regular basis. The editors' selections of documents to publish from among the incoming mounds of requests for appointments to offices both significant and trivial, petitions for executive clemency, suggestions concerning military strategy, and pleas for personal financial assistance show that the nineteenth-century presidency mixed fascinating high politics with a substantial burden of tedious administrative work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of American HistorySame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207