MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325233235 · doi:10.1241/johokanri.50.11

CISTI: Bridging the information gap

2007· article· en· W2325233235 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
written. Naomi KRYM, transl. Hideaki SUZUKI, transl. Shigeru MATSUSHITA

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Information Processing and Management · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicLibrary Science and Information Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridging (networking)Computer scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CISTI(Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information)は,1924年創立の科学情報図書館であり,科学,技術,工学,医学分野に関するドキュメントデリバリー分野の主導的な役割を担っている。CISTIの一部門として1929年に発足したNRC Research Pressは,16誌の国際研究雑誌と書籍や会議録を刊行している。本稿では,調査研究のニーズに応じてCISTIのサービスを活用する方法について詳述する。日本においては,CISTIのサービスは信頼あるパートナーのサンメディアを通じて利用することができる。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0100.023
Science and technology studies0.0090.009
Scholarly communication0.0240.028
Open science0.0040.012
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1010.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Information Processing and ManagementSame topicLibrary Science and Information SystemsFrench-language works237,207