MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325259733 · doi:10.1086/664133

: <i> <i>Libertas philosophandi: Teologia e filosofia nella</i> Lettera alla granduchessa Cristina di Lorena <i>di Galileo Galilei</i> </i>

2011· article· it· W2325259733 on OpenAlexaff
W. R. Laird

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance Quarterly · 2011
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalileo (satellite navigation)ArtHumanitiesPhilosophyIndex (typography)Geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alfredo Damanti. Libertas philosophandi: Teologia e filosofia nella Lettera alla granduchessa Cristina di Lorena di Galileo Galilei. Temi e Testi 71. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 2010. xxii + 538 pp. index. bibl. €65. ISBN: 978–88–6372–082–2. - Volume 64 Issue 4

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance QuarterlySame topicRenaissance Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207