MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325304535 · doi:10.1097/mbp.0000000000000087

BMI, annual blood pressure measurements, and mortality in patients with obesity and hypertension

2014· article· en· W2325304535 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Pressure Monitoring · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsDiabetes CanadaUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineBlood pressureInterquartile rangeOdds ratioBody mass indexInternal medicineObesityConfidence intervalPopulationLogistic regressionCohortCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In-clinic blood pressure measurement is recommended annually for all hypertensive individuals, but can be difficult to perform in obese patients. We aimed to examine a population-based cohort of obese hypertensive patients to determine whether: (a) BMI was inversely associated with annual blood pressure measurement and (b) performing annual blood pressure measurements was associated with reduced mortality independent of BMI. PATIENTS/METHODS: We carried out a retrospective cohort analysis in 4972 obese hypertensive patients from UK primary care. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to examine the association between obesity class (class 1=BMI 30-34.9; class 2=35.0-39.9; class 3=40 kg/m or greater) and annual blood pressure measurement. An accelerated failure time multivariable model was used to examine the association between annual blood pressure measurement and mortality. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 52.3 ± 9.6 years, the mean BMI was 34.1 ± 4.8 kg/m, and the median follow-up was 13.5 (interquartile range 6.8-20.3) years. A total of 519 (10.4%) patients died. Annual blood pressure measurements were performed in 1605 (47.0%) patients with class 1, 429 (40.2%) with class 2, and 198 (41.1%) with class 3 obesity (P<0.001). Compared with class 1, the covariate-adjusted odds of annual blood pressure measurement was 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-0.98] for class 2 and 0.87 (95% CI 0.71-1.07) for class 3. Annual blood pressure measurement was associated with an 18.9% (95% CI 9.4-28.3) increase in survival. CONCLUSION: Less than 50% of obese hypertensive patients underwent annual blood pressure measurements and measurements were less frequent in severely obese patients. Annual blood pressure measurement was associated with increased survival. Strategies to improve measurement frequency in obese patients should be implemented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it