MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325388016 · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1218.2012.00363

Joystick-based Control for a Biomimetic Biped Climbing Robot

2012· article· en· W2325388016 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueROBOT · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Locomotion and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoystickClimbingComputer scienceRobotSimulationMobile robotArtificial intelligenceEngineeringControl engineeringHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A joystick-based control method is studied for Climbot, which is a novel 5-DoF (degree of freedom) biomimetic biped climbing robot. The kinematics and the available grasping area of the robot are analyzed firstly. And then, according to the characteristics of the robot biped climbing by switching its fixed-gripper, an intuitional joystick-based operating mode is proposed, in which different operating coordinates are defined for corresponding climbing gaits, and a matrix transform algorithm is presented to keep the robot coordinate system unchanging after switching its fixed-gripper. Finally, road-pole climbing experiments with three gaits (including inchworm-like, turning-around and turning-over gaits) and an application demonstration are carried out to verify the effectiveness of the presented joystick-based control method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it