MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325388700 · doi:10.2307/27652792

Irritation als narratives Prinzip: Untersuchungen zur Rezeptionssteuerung in den Romanen Milan Kunderas. By Doris Boden. Westostpassagen: Slawistische Forschungen und Texte. Literatur, Sprache, Kultur, vol. 4. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 2006. 353 pp. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Tables. €48.00, paper.

2008· article· de· W2325388700 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSlavic Review · 2008
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterature, Musicology, and Cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDoris (gastropod)ArtArt historyIndex (typography)Humanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Irritation als narratives Prinzip: Untersuchungen zur Rezeptionssteuerung in den Romanen Milan Kunderas. By Doris Boden. Westostpassagen: Slawistische Forschungen und Texte. Literatur, Sprache, Kultur, vol. 4. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 2006. 353 pp. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Tables. €48.00, paper. - Volume 67 Issue 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.018
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it