MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325487340 · doi:10.1177/0163443710386519

Creative statistics to support creative economy politics

2011· article· en· W2325487340 on OpenAlexaff
Gaëtan Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueMedia Culture & Society · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsCreative economyPolitical scienceCreativityLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

tries’, a notion that several analysts and commentators have readily used to substitute for the concept of ‘cultural industries’. Gradually, promoters of an economic strategy based on the development of these creative industry sectors have come to generalize this notion, now speaking of the ‘creative economy’. Taken up by technocrats from various countries, and even by those in the United Nations (UN), this approach has enjoyed success. Recently, in April 2008, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) made public a document written by experts whose explicit objective was to measure the degree of development of the creative economy in all regions of the world,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.216
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.216
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.015
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0120.017
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedia Culture & SocietySame topicCultural Industries and Urban DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207