MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2325505501 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am10-40

Abstract 40: Developmental profile and regulation of the glycolytic enzyme hexokinase 2 and its association with aerobic glycolysis

2010· article· en· W2325505501 on OpenAlexaff
Amparo Wolf, Sameer Agnihotri, Diana M. Munoz-Gajadhar, Cynthia Hawkins, Abhijit Guha

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnaerobic glycolysisGlycolysisHexokinaseBiologyCarbohydrate metabolismInternal medicineBiochemistryEndocrinologyEnzymeMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Proliferating embryonic and tumor tissues rely on aerobic glycolysis, or the metabolism of glucose to lactate under oxygenated conditions, to assist in the synthesis of biosynthetic precursors necessary for proliferation. The reliance on aerobic glycolysis may be mediated by the expression of specific metabolic enzymes. Mammalian Hexokinases HK1 and HK2 are 100kDa proteins that phosphorylate glucose to glucose-6-phosphate as the first step of the glycolytic pathway. In normal adult tissues, HK1 is ubiquitously expressed but is particularly prominent in the brain and kidney. HK2 is generally expressed at low levels within adipose tissue and skeletal tissue and negligently in normal brain. In this study, we wished to determine the ontogeny of these isoforms within the developing brain and determine how their expression relates to the extent of aerobic glycolysis in Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM), a highly aggressive malignant brain tumor. Mining of existing published microarray data found strong expression of HK1 in 1, 2, 4 cell stage but a switch to stronger expression of HK2 in the blastocyst stage, previously reported to rely heavily on aerobic glycolysis. We performed HK2 immunohistochemistry in mice from gestational age E12, E16, post natal 1 month and 2 months. Our results demonstrated an age and cell specific HK1 and HK2 immunoreactivity in embryonic brain tissue with decreased expression of HK2 post-natally. Subsequently, we investigated the expression of HK1 and HK2 isoforms in a panel of GBM cell lines with varying levels of dependence on aerobic glycolysis, as measured by lactate levels and O2 consumption. HK2 but not HK1 expression was higher in GBM cells that had low O2 consumption and high extracellular lactate levels, supporting an association of HK2 with aerobic glycolysis. As HK2 expression is nearly silent in adult brain but expressed in fetal tissue and GBM cells, we hypothesized that DNA methylation/demethylation events may be playing important in its regulation. Adult normal human brain and GBM cell lines that had no HK2 expression were found to be methylated at CpG islands within intron 1 by bisulfite sequencing in contrast to fetal tissue and HK2-expressing GBM cells. The degree of methylation correlated with transcript expression in GBM cell lines. Treatment of U343 and A172 cell lines with 5-azacytidine restored HK2 transcript expression, supporting that HK2 maybe epigenetically regulated. Overall, our results demonstrate that the expression of the HK2 isoform, in contrast to HK1, may be particularly important in tissues relying on aerobic glycolysis for proliferation including embryonic tissue and GBMs. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 40.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→