MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325522748 · doi:10.4006/0836-1398-25.4.547

On a model of the electron and the other leptons

2012· article· en· W2325522748 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Athanasios A. Markou

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Essays · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsLeptonParticle physicsElectronNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The central idea for a model of the electron and the other leptons is presented. In this model, the electron and the charged leptons are coreless spiral electric field vortices derived from the Lituus spiral. The central region of the vortices is free of field. Such a vortex structure makes the lepton electric field self-supporting (no dependence on a central charge). The electric field configuration at large distances is the same for all charged leptons, assigning them the same charge. Their mass and stability would depend on their winding numbers. Some considerations are presented on a structure of the neutrinos and the massive gauge bosons. In this model, neutrinos turn out to be different from their corresponding antineutrinos (Dirac neutrinos). The above spiral structure could imply nonzero spin, and might thus explain the observed scarcity (or absence) of scalar elementary particles. In addition, it will mean that the heavier leptons and the massive gauge bosons decay through vortex fission; therefore the muon decay to an electron and a photon would not exist. It could also help to give some insight into some branching ratios in the massive gauge boson decays, which are presently determined only experimentally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics EssaysSame topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207