Formation Mechanism and Structure of a Guanine–Uracil DNA Intrastrand Cross-Link
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The formation and structure of the 5'-G[8-5]U-3' intrastrand cross-link are studied using density functional theory and molecular dynamics simulations due to the potential role of this lesion in the activity of 5-halouracils in antitumor therapies. Upon UV irradiation of 5-halouracil-containing DNA, a guanine radical cation reacts with the uracil radical to form the cross-link, which involves phosphorescence or an intersystem crossing and a rate-determining step of bond formation. Following ionizing radiation, guanine and the uracil radical react, with a rate-limiting step involving hydrogen atom removal. Although cross-link formation from UV radiation is favored, comparison of calculated reaction thermokinetics with that for related experimentally observed purine-pyrimidine cross-links suggests this lesion is also likely to form from ionizing radiation. For the first time, the structure of 5'-G[8-5]U-3' within DNA is identified by molecular dynamics simulations. Furthermore, three conformations of cross-linked DNA are revealed, which differ in the configuration of the complementary bases. Distortions, such as unwinding, are localized to the cross-linked dinucleotide and complementary nucleotides, with minimal changes to the flanking bases. Global changes to the helix, such as bending and groove alterations, parallel cisplatin-induced distortions, which indicate 5'-G[8-5]U-3', may contribute to the cytotoxicity of halouracils in tumor cell DNA using similar mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".