MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325533923 · doi:10.1149/06428.0001ecst

Localized Corrosion Behaviour in Dissimilar AZ31/AZ80 Friction Stir Welds

2015· article· en· W2325533923 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuri Savguira, Thomas H. North, Steven J. Thorpe

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Welding Techniques Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceMetallurgyCorrosionWeldingFriction stir weldingBase metalIntermetallicGalvanic corrosionPolarization (electrochemistry)Galvanic cellIntergranular corrosionDissolutionComposite materialAlloy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Corrosion of a dissimilar friction stir weld (FSW) made in AZ31/AZ80 magnesium alloys has been investigated using the scanning reference electrode technique (SRET), and microcapillary polarization technique. The corrosion rate of each of the base metals along with the welded specimen was estimated by mass loss testing and mixed potential theory. The stir zone material in both alloys showed a higher reduction potential than the base metal, due to the dissolution of β-Mg 17 Al 12, and Al-Mn intermetallic particles. The dissimilar welded specimen exhibited a higher corrosion rate compared to either AZ31 or AZ80. The governing corrosion mechanism in dissimilar welds was determined to be different from FSSW joints made with a singular material. The corrosion behaviour of the dissimilar FSW joint was governed by the galvanic coupling of the two alloys, and not by the microstructural evolution that occurred during the welding process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicAdvanced Welding Techniques AnalysisFrench-language works237,207