MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325548384 · doi:10.2514/6.2010-7960

Multiple Satellite Formation Flying Using Differential Solar Radiation Pressure

2010· article· en· W2325548384 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Dynamics and Control
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSatelliteRadiation pressureRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceRadiationAerospace engineeringDifferential (mechanical device)AstrobiologyMeteorologyComputer sciencePhysicsGeologyOpticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

*† In this paper we propose the use of differential solar radiation pressure for multiple satellite formation flying. The nonlinear dynamics describing the motion of the follower satellite relative to the leader satellite is considered for the case where the leader satellite is in an unperturbed reference orbit, and the stability of such a formation in the presence of external perturbations is investigated. Several cases are considered to examine the performance of the proposed control strategy to maintain the relative motion of the follower satellites by correcting for any initial offset errors and external perturbation effects that tend to disturb the formation system. Numerical simulation results confirm that the suggested methodology using differential solar radiation pressure yields reasonable formation keeping precision and its effectiveness in ensuring formation maneuvering .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it