MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325587457 · doi:10.2118/168294-ms

Coiled Tubing Material Selection for Velocity Strings in Sour Brine Service

2014· article· en· W2325587457 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsShell (Canada)
FundersShell Canada
KeywordsCoiled tubingSubseaSour gasCorrosionMaterials scienceStress corrosion crackingMaterial selectionMetallurgyWeldingCarbon steelWorkoverComposite materialPetroleum engineeringEngineeringMarine engineeringWaste managementNatural gas

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Installing coiled tubing velocity strings is a common deliquification strategy used in gas wells in which the flowrate has dropped below the critical rate required to remove produced liquids from the well. Initially in Shell’s Groundbirch unconventional gas development, a standard carbon steel coiled tubing grade was used for these applications. Due to elevated levels of chlorides, carbon dioxide and in some cases H2S, a long-term inhibition schedule was then needed to minimize corrosion. Recently, however, a special CRA material has been employed, that Shell had previously helped develop for subsea applications (Li et al, 2002), which has eliminated the need for costly long term inhibition. This paper outlines the selection process and implementation of this material change. Standard 13Cr alloys are well known in the industry but could not be used in the Groundbirch fields due to the high chlorides levels of the produced water as well as H2S levels sometimes above NACE thresholds. On this basis, higher chromium coiled tubing materials were evaluated based on their ability to resist corrosion, sulphide and chloride stress cracking, as well as their mechanical properties. A fit for purpose material testing program was used, combining standard NACE test protocols with unconventional specimen shapes and crevice corrosion assessments in simulated well environments. Factors such as the direction of primary loading stresses, mechanical deformation during installation, as well as coiled tubing manufacturing characteristics such as the longitudinal seam, bias welds, and orbital (butt) welds were also considered. From this fit-for-purpose testing, not only was the preferred corrosion-resistant material, Nitronic 19D duplex-steel, selected for the coiled tubing strings, but an operating envelope has been developed for it, as well as manufacturing specifications have been defined for the strings for optimum performance. Installation guidelines to reduce the mechanical damage inflicted on the strings have also been created. Although the campaign startup was delayed due to manufacturing issues, once the campaign did start, the installations have been efficient, with future campaigns planned. By selecting a single, robust material grade for CT Velocity String material for a variety of potential conditions (high salinity, CO2, H2S), and also developing some guidelines for their use, installations can be done efficiently in Groundbirch in large campaigns, with long term cost savings from eliminating the need for continuous inhibition. Furthermore, the long term integrity of the strings should benefit, ultimately leading to longer completion life, less production deferment, and less intervention issues due to corroded and failed CT strings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it