MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325606430 · doi:10.2514/6.2007-5203

Thrust Vector Control Using Multi-Channel Hall-Effect Thrusters

2007· article· en· W2325606430 on OpenAlexaff
Olivier Duchemin, Dominique Valentian

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrustPhysicsChannel (broadcasting)Vector controlHall effectAerospace engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

*† A Hall thruster design is presented, in which multiple discharge chambers share a common magnetic circuit, cathode, and power supply. This arrangement provides not only most of the advantages commonly attributed to multi-thruster assemblies, or clusters, but also facilitates control of the direction of thrust without the need for a complex gimbal mechanism. In addition, it reduces the mass penalty associated with clustering multiple, independent thrusters. Several conceptual designs are presented, and the thrust steering performance is discussed. Finally, the main electrical propulsion sub-system trade-offs associated with such an architecture are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207