Kinetics of Catalytic Pyrolysis of Heavy Gas Oil Derived from Canadian Synthetic Crude Oil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The catalytic pyrolysis of heavy gas oil derived from Canadian synthetic crude oil on zeolite catalyst was conducted in a confined fluidized bed reactor. The optimal reaction temperature, weight hourly space velocity, steam-to-oil weight ratio, and catalyst-to-oil weight ratio were 660 °C, 9.5 h –1, 0.6, and 20, respectively. The yield of total light olefins was 36.4 wt % under these optimal conditions. The overall reactants and products were classified into seven species, and a seven-lump kinetic model with 15 rate constants and a catalyst deactivation constant was proposed. Kinetic constants at 620, 640, 660, and 680 °C were estimated by a nonlinear least-squares regression method. Preexponential factors and apparent activation energies were then calculated according to the Arrhenius equation. The feed lump had larger rate constants and smaller apparent activation energies than did the intermediate product lumps. The seven-lump kinetic model showed high calculation precision and the predicted yields agreed well with the experimental values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".