MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325643677 · doi:10.1021/ja108451v

Kinetics of the Formation of Silver Dimers: Early Stages in the Formation of Silver Nanoparticles

2011· article· en· W2325643677 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanocluster Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistrySilver nanoparticleFlash photolysisKineticsNanoparticleFluorescencePhotochemistryAqueous solutionReaction rate constantChemical engineeringPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silver clusters too small to support a plasmon band possess interesting fluorescence properties as well as being a convenient route to studying the early stages of nanoparticle formation. Fluorescent silver clusters are synthesized in toluene solution, and the formation is monitored herein by laser flash photolysis (LFP). Kinetic analysis of the formation of the Ag clusters is consistent with the formation of the smallest possible clusters, silver dimers (Ag(2)), whereby a mechanism for the formation of these clusters is provided as well as the first reported extinction coefficient and association constant for Ag(0) to form Ag(2). The formation of Ag(2) clusters is contrasted with the formation of Ag nanoparticles in aqueous media, and the particular stability and selectivity toward Ag(2) in this system is also studied using LFP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it