MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325668179 · doi:10.1086/685285

An invasive benthic fish magnifies trophic cascades and alters pelagic communities in an experimental freshwater system

2016· article· en· W2325668179 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFreshwater Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersPeking University Third Hospital
KeywordsRound gobyNeogobiusTrophic levelTrophic cascadeBenthic zoneBiologyEcologyDreissenaPhytoplanktonPelagic zoneBiomass (ecology)Food webFisheryInvasive speciesNutrientMolluscaBivalvia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most studies of the consequences of nonnative fish introductions address only direct effects rather than cascading effects on lower trophic levels or other ecosystem compartments. These trophic cascades have not been studied in comparison to the effects of a functionally similar native species nor with consideration of bottom-up forces (e.g., nutrient supply). The Round Goby (Neogobius melanostomus) is an invasive benthic predator that can deplete local populations of grazers, potentially generating substantive increases in benthic algal biomass. Here, we tested, with a factorial experimental design, the influence of Round Gobies on the relative strength of top-down and bottom-up forces in benthic communities by manipulating consumer type (Round Goby or native Logperch (Percina caprodes), snails only, or controls where snails and fish were absent), nutrient addition, and the presence of an invasive suspension feeder (Quagga Mussel [Dreissena bugensis]) in freshwater mesocosms. We also investigated how these perturbations affect phytoplankton and zooplankton communities. We observed stronger top-down forces in the presence of Round Gobies vs native Logperch, and these forces resulted in reduced grazer abundance and a concomitant increase in benthic algal abundance. However, when Quagga Mussels were present, bottom-up forces dominated. Round Gobies had a significantly greater positive effect on phytoplankton than did native Logperch. Our results highlight the importance of measuring top-down and bottom-up forces in comparison with a trophically similar native species to elucidate the ramifying effects of a nonnative predator on food webs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it