MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Circulating Free-Tryptophan To Tyrosine As A Marker Of Central Fatigue During Heat Stress

2011· article· en· W2325711601 on OpenAlexaff
Tom M. McLellan, Heather E. Wright, Glen A. Selkirk, Shawn G. Rhind

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTryptophanInternal medicineEndocrinologyTyrosineSerotoninChemistryVenous bloodHeat stressMedicineBiochemistryAnimal scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One theory of central fatigue during exertional heat stress involves the influence on central nervous system activation of the changing ratio of serotonin and dopamine in key thermoregulatory centres in the brain. Circulating concentrations of the precursors, free-tryptophan (f-TRP) and tyrosine (TYR), respectively, compete for the same active carrier across the blood-brain-barrier. Thus, changes in the circulating ratio of f-TRP/TYR may be indicative of changing neurotransmitters in the brain and may help explain the different thermotolerance between endurance trained (TR) and untrained (UT). PURPOSE: The purpose was to examine the use of f-TRP/TYR as an indicator of impending fatigue in TR and UT males during acute uncompensable heat stress to exhaustion (EXH). METHODS: Twelve TR and eleven UT (Mean±SE: VO2peak= 70±2 and 50±1 mL·kgLBM-1·min-1, 11±1 and 16±1% fat, respectively) walked to EXH (Tre= 39.7 and 39.0°C, respectively) on a treadmill (4.5 km·h-1, 2% grade) in 40°C and 30% R.H., wearing combat clothing and a protective hooded overgarment. Before and at a Tre of 38.0, 38.5, 39.0°C, and EXH, venous blood samples were obtained. Serum was analyzed for prolactin (PRL) using a chemiluminescent immunoassay, and plasma analyzed for f-TRP and TYR using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. RESULTS: TR tolerated a higher Tre (39.7 ± 0.1°C) than the UT (39.0 ± 0.1°C). TYR remained unchanged throughout the heat stress and was not different between groups at baseline (65 ± 3 and 68 ± 6 μM for TR and UT, respectively) or EXH (64 ± 3 and 65 ± 3 μM for TR and UT, respectively). In contrast, f-TRP was higher to a Tre of 39.0°C for TR but thereafter fell significantly to EXH where values were similar between groups (5.7 ± 0.5 and 5.5 ± 0.3 μM for TR and UT, respectively). As a result, f-TRP/TYR was higher for TR (0.11 ± 0.01) vs UT (0.09 ± 0.01) to a Tre of 39.0°C but decreased significantly thereafter for TR to EXH where values were similar for TR (0.09 ± 0.01) vs UT (0.09 ± 0.01). f-TRP/TYR was not related to the increase in PRL which tracked the change in Tre for both groups. Also, there was no relationship between f-TRP/TYR and PRL at EXH (r = 0.17, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Circulating TYR and f-TRP/TYR ratio are not sensitive markers of impending fatigue for TR and UT during exertional heat stress. Funded by a Defence R&D Canada Technology Investment Fund.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→