MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2325719561 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-2717

Abstract 2717: Reolysin: A novel reovirus-based agent that induces endoplasmic reticular stress in RAS-activated pancreatic cancer

2012· article· en· W2325719561 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer S. Carew, Claudia M. Espitia, Kevin R. Kelly, Matt Coffey, James W. Freeman, Steffan T. Nawrocki

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsOncolytics Biotech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKRASPancreatic cancerCancer researchApoptosisBiologyUnfolded protein responseOncogeneTunicamycinEndoplasmic reticulumCancerImmunologyCell biologyCell cycleColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mutations in the RAS oncogene are associated with transformation and proliferation and are prevalent in many tumor types. Since RAS is frequently hyperactivated in pancreatic cancer and plays an essential role in tumor progression, it is an ideal therapeutic target. Reoviruses are naturally occurring viruses that are non-pathogenic and have been reported to specifically replicate in cancer cells with an activated RAS pathway, but not in normal tissue. To take advantage of this observation therapeutically, the reovirus-based anticancer agent Reolysin was recently developed. Reolysin has already progressed into clinical trials, but its mechanisms of action have not been fully elucidated. We hypothesized that Reolysin exposure would result in the production of viral products, stimulate endoplasmic reticular (ER) stress, and induce apoptosis. Reolysin treatment triggered the selective replication of reoviruses as visualized by immunocytochemistry and electron microscopy in KRAS-transformed immortalized human pancreatic duct epithelial cells and in a panel of pancreatic cancer cell lines. Reovirus accumulation was associated with an increase in the expression of ER stress-related genes as assessed by microarray and quantitative RT-PCR analyses, cleavage of caspase-4, and induction of apoptosis. In support of our hypothesis that Reolysin induces ER stress-mediated apoptosis, co-treatment with tunicamycin or brefeldin A further augmented Reolysin-induced cell death. Previous studies have demonstrated that the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib causes ER stress-mediated apoptosis. Here we show that co-treatment with bortezomib and Reolysin stimulates the simultaneous accumulation of ubiquitinated and viral proteins resulting in enhanced levels of ER stress-related gene expression, caspase-4 cleavage, and apoptosis. The role of caspase-4 as a regulator of therapeutic sensitivity to these agents was investigated by targeting caspase-4 expression with siRNA. Knockdown of caspase-4 blunted apoptosis stimulated by Reolysin, bortezomib, and the combination. Importantly, bortezomib also dramatically augmented the anticancer activity of Reolysin in xenograft models of pancreatic cancer in vivo. Analysis of tumor specimens from mice treated with Reolysin and bortezomib displayed reovirus accumulation, enhanced expression of GRP78/Bip, a marker of ER stress and increased levels of apoptosis. Collectively, our results demonstrate that the abnormal protein accumulation induced by Reolysin and bortezomib promotes heightened ER stress and apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2717. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-2717

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicVirus-based gene therapy research→French-language works237,207→