MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Impact of Acute Mental Stress on Handgrip Exercise Induced Brachial Artery Flow-Mediated Vasodilation

2011· article· en· W2325732929 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ingrid C. Szijgyarto, Trevor J. King, Kyra E. Pyke

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrachial arteryMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineMental stressHemodynamicsReactive hyperemiaMental arithmeticVasodilationBlood pressureHeart rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic stress is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease however the role of endothelial function in this relationship remains unclear. Although controversial, it has been shown that acute mental stress can impair brachial artery flow mediated dilation (FMD) following a reactive hyperemia (RH) induced increase in shear stress (SS). However it is currently unknown whether acute stress impairs FMD following exercise induced increases in SS. It is important to investigate FMD using exercise induced increases in SS because the stimulus is controlled and more physiologically relevant compared to the transient increase in SS associated with RH. PURPOSE: to determine whether an acute increase in mental stress results in a similar attenuation of brachial artery FMD following RH and handgrip exercise (EX) induced increases in shear stress. METHODS: brachial artery (BA) FMD was investigated in 16 male subjects (18-28 yrs) with Echo and Doppler ultrasound. Each subject participated in two experimental visits: Visit A RH induced increases in shear stress to determine FMD; Visit B EX induced increases in SS to determine FMD (visits order counterbalanced between subjects). SS estimated by shear rate (SR= BA blood velocity/ BA diameter). FMD tests were performed 10 min after both a control task (CT- count upwards from 1) and a 20min mental stress task (ST- speech task followed by mental arithmetic (based on the Trier Social Stress Test)). Results are means ± SE. RESULTS: The ST was successful in elevating hemodynamic variables: average mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased 19.77 ± 2.06 mmHg during the stress task vs. 4.28 ± 1.57 mmHg during the CT (p=<0.001). Heart rate (HR) increased 12.71 ± 2.07 bpm during the ST vs. 4.50 ± 0.49 bpm during the CT (p= 0.005). The ST had no impact on the SR stimulus magnitude in either test; Post CT RH SR area under the curve (AUC) 5117.75 ± 376.6 s-1 vs. Post ST RH SR AUC 4364.08 ± 403.70 s-1 (p= 0.132). Post CT SR during the last min of handgrip exercise was 58.90± 0.91s-1 vs. 59.30 ± 1.29 s-1 Post ST (p=>0.05). Post CT RH FMD was 5.34±0.56% vs. Post ST RH FMD 4.55± 0.47%; Post CT EX FMD was 4.66± 0.73% vs. Post ST EX FMD 5.46± 0.62% (p= >0.05). CONCLUSION: There was no impact of acute mental stress on FMD following either an RH or an EX induced increase in SS. Supported by Canada Foundation for Innovation and NSERC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicCardiac Health and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→