Accompagner des enseignants de l’enseignement professionnel dans un changement de posture entre héritage du métier et transmission en enseignement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La question de l’accompagnement en formation que nous abordons ici touche les enseignants débutants de l’enseignement professionnel au Québec. Professionnels de leur métier avant de devenir enseignants, ceux-ci doivent relever de nombreux défis parmi lesquels l’identité en changement leur pose une question grave : être ou ne plus être le professionnel de son métier en devenant enseignant interroge la légitimité de la transmission des savoirs et des pratiques du métier. Peuvent-ils alors se sentir encore les héritiers et les transmetteurs d’un métier qu’ils ne pratiquent plus ? Nous avons posé cette question de fond dans le cadre d’un cours de la formation à l’enseignement, dans le but d’en accompagner une réflexion individuelle et collective. Ce texte puise à l’analyse de deux regards sur cette situation de formation, croisement du témoignage du formateur universitaire qui accompagne et de celui des enseignants en formation sur leur perception de cette question existentielle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".