MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325815365 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.181801

Improved Search for<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math>Oscillation in a Long-Baseline Accelerator Experiment

2006· article· lv· W2325815365 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Yamamoto, J. Zalipska, E. Aliu, S. Andringa, S. Aoki, J. Argyriades, K. Asakura, R. Ashie, F. Berghaus, H. Berns, H. Bhang, A. Blondel, S. Borghi, J. Bouchez, J. Burguet–Castell, D. Casper, J. Catala, C. Cavata, A. Cervera, S. M. Chen, K. O. Cho, J. H. Choi, U. Dore, M. Fechner, E. Fernández, Y. Fukuda, J.J. Gómez-Cadenas, R. Gran, T. Hara, M. Hasegawa, T. Hasegawa, Kenji Hayashi, Y. Hayato, R. L. Helmer, K. Hiraide, J. Hosaka, A. K. Ichikawa, M. Iinuma, Akihiro Ikeda, T. Inagaki, Toru Ishida, K. Ishihara, T. Ishii, M. Ishitsuka, Y. Itow, T. Iwashita, H. I. Jang, E. J. Jeon, In Seok Jeong, K. K. Joo, C. K. Jung, T. Kajita, J. Kameda, K. Kaneyuki, I. Kato, E. Kearns, D. Kerr, C. O. Kim, M. Khabibullin, A. Khotjantsev, D. Kiełczewska, J. Y. Kim, S. B. Kim, P. Kitching, Kazuyoshi Kobayashi, T. Kobayashi, A. Konaka, Y. Koshio, W. Kropp, Jun Kubota, Y. Kudenko, Y. Kuno, Yoshinori Kurimoto, T. Kutter, J. G. Learned, S. Likhoded, I. T. Lim, P. Loverre, L. Ludovici, H. Maesaka, J. Mallet, C. Mariani, S. Matsuno, V. Matveev, K. McConnel, C. McGrew, S. Mikheyev, A. Minamino, S. Mine, O. Mineev, C. Mitsuda, M. Miura, Y. Moriguchi, T. Morita, S. Moriyama, T. Nakadaira, M. Nakahata, K. Nakamura, I. Nakano, T. Nakaya, S. Nakayama, T. Namba, R. Nambu, S. Nawang, K. Nishikawa, Koh‐hei Nitta, F. Nova, P. Novella, Y. Obayashi, Atsushi Okada, K. Okumura, S. M. Oser, Y. Oyama, M. Y. Pac, F. Pierre, A. Rodriguez, C. Saji, M. Sakuda, F. Sánchez, A. Sarrat, T. Sasaki, H. Sato, K. Scholberg, R. Schroeter, M. Sekiguchi, M. Shiozawa, Kiyoshi Shiraishi, G. Sitjes, M. Smy, H. Sobel, M. Sorel, J. L. Stone, L. Sulak, Y. Suzuki, Takuya Takahashi, Y. Takenaga, Y. Takeuchi, K. Taki, Y. Takubo, N. Tamura, M. Tanaka, R. Terri, S. T’Jampens, A. Tornero-López, Y. Totsuka, S. Ueda, M. R. Vagins, L. Whitehead, C. W. Walter, W. Wang, R. J. Wilkes, S. Yamada, C. Yanagisawa, N. Yershov, H. Yokoyama, M. Yokoyama, J. Yoo, M. Yoshida

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareStrongMinisterio de Ciencia y TecnologíaInstitute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of TokyoMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyKorea Science and Engineering FoundationU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsOscillation (cell signaling)NeutrinoParticle physicsAlgorithmCombinatoricsComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We performed an improved search for ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\nu}}_{e}$ oscillation with the KEK to Kamioka (K2K) long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment, using the full data sample of $9.2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{19}$ protons on target. No evidence for a ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{e}$ appearance signal was found, and we set bounds on the ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\nu}}_{e}$ oscillation parameters. At $\ensuremath{\Delta}{m}^{2}=2.8\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{eV}}^{2}$, the best-fit value of the K2K ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ disappearance analysis, we set an upper limit of ${sin}^{2}2{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}e}&lt;0.13$ at a 90% confidence level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207