Bilateral Rostral Maxillectomy for the Treatment of Oral Well-differentiated Fibrosarcoma in a Golden Retriever
Bibliographic record
Abstract
9歳, 雌のゴールデンレトリバーの上顎腫瘤を生検し, 紡錘形細胞の増殖を認めた。北海道大学附属動物病院で精査したところ, 肉眼的観察において硬口蓋の膨隆と糜燗化した腫瘍様組織の歯肉から上顎骨背側方向への進展が認められ, CT検査では, 上顎骨が吸収され, 病巣は鼻腔内に及んでいた。CT検査による腫瘍の拡がりをもとにして手術計画を立て, 第2前臼歯まで含めた上顎骨両側吻側切除を実施した。切除検体の組織学的検査により, 病巣は高分化型線維肉腫であり, 切除マージンに腫瘍細胞がないことが判った。本症例は, 上顎が萎縮性に短縮したものの, 術後25か月経過した現在も再発および転移を認めず健存中である。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".