MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325824455 · doi:10.1021/jp2103462

Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Evidence for the Interaction of HAlOH with Water Molecules

2012· article· en· W2325824455 on OpenAlexaff
François D. Brunet, Helen A. Joly

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAmmonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectron paramagnetic resonanceMoleculeElectron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopyResonance (particle physics)Nuclear magnetic resonanceParamagnetismMaterials scienceChemistryChemical physicsAtomic physicsPhysicsCondensed matter physicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complex HAlOH:(H(2)O) has been detected by matrix-isolation IR spectroscopy. This complex was speculated to be the species responsible for the chemiluminescent glow associated with the explosion of trimethyl aluminum or aluminum grenades in the upper atomosphere. Theoretical studies suggest that HAlOH:(H(2)O)(n) is a critical precursor in the formation of H(2) in the reaction of Al with liquid water. In our study, Al atoms were reacted with mixtures of D(2)O/He or H(2)(17)O/He in an adamantane matrix in a metal-atom reactor, known as a rotating cryostat, maintained at 77 K and at <10(-6) Torr. In addition to DAlOD and HAlOH, which formed from the reaction of Al atoms with adventitious water, EPR analysis of the Al-D(2)O/He reaction mixture from 77 to 290 K showed that HAlOH:(D(2)O) and DAlOD:(D(2)O) formed. The experimental nuclear hyperfine interactions (hfis) for these species were in close agreement with those calculated using the B3LYP density functional method and the 6-311+G(2df,p) basis set. The effect of complexation is to lower the Al hfi of HAlOH and DAlOD by ca. 8%, the H hfi of HAlOH by ca. 28%, and the D hfi of DAlOD by ca. 35%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicAmmonia Synthesis and Nitrogen ReductionFrench-language works237,207