Improvements to Direct Quantitative Analysis of Multiple MicroRNAs Facilitating Faster Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies suggest that patterns of deregulation in sets of microRNA (miRNA) can be used as cancer diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Establishing a "miRNA fingerprint"-based diagnostic technique requires a suitable miRNA quantitation method. The appropriate method must be direct, sensitive, capable of simultaneous analysis of multiple miRNAs, rapid, and robust. Direct quantitative analysis of multiple microRNAs (DQAMmiR) is a recently introduced capillary electrophoresis-based hybridization assay that satisfies most of these criteria. Previous implementations of the method suffered, however, from slow analysis time and required lengthy and stringent purification of hybridization probes. Here, we introduce a set of critical improvements to DQAMmiR that address these technical limitations. First, we have devised an efficient purification procedure that achieves the required purity of the hybridization probe in a fast and simple fashion. Second, we have optimized the concentrations of the DNA probe to decrease the hybridization time to 10 min. Lastly, we have demonstrated that the increased probe concentrations and decreased incubation time removed the need for masking DNA, further simplifying the method and increasing its robustness. The presented improvements bring DQAMmiR closer to use in a clinical setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".