Efficacy of Recombinant Human Growth Hormone in Children with Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis and Growth Failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ten patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) and growth failure were treated with recombinant human growth hormone (GH) for 1 to 3 years at a dosage of 0.57 IU/kg/wk. All the patients had been on prednisone at a mean dosage of 4.12 mg p.o. daily. GH was low in one patient, two patients had a borderline level and seven patients had adequate response to provocative tests or post-sleep measurement. Serum IGF-I was found to be low in five of six patients. Mean growth velocity increased from 2.45 cm/yr to 4.79 cm/yr after 1 year's treatment with GH (P<0.004). Six patients continued on GH treatment for a second year and continued to have a better growth velocity, with a mean of 5.43 cm/yr (P<0.014). Two patients entered puberty during the second year of GH treatment. This study demonstrates the potential beneficial effect of GH treatment in patients with JRA with growth failure of systemic onset or polyarticular onset who are on prednisone. Further study is needed to determine the long-term effect of GH treatment on ultimate height.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".