MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325950746 · doi:10.1049/el.2015.3379

Generalised two‐box cascaded Hammerstein‐like digital predistorter for wide‐band RF power amplifiers

2016· article· en· W2325950746 on OpenAlexaff
Gaoming Xu, Taijun Liu, Yan Ye, Jun Li, Fadhel M. Ghannouchi

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersK. C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo UniversityNatural Science Foundation of NingboNingbo UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAmplifierPredistortionElectronic engineeringPower (physics)Computer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A generalised two‐box cascaded Hammerstein‐like (GTBC‐H) digital predistorter is proposed for linearising wide‐band RF power amplifiers (PAs). The GTBC‐H predistorter is composed of a static nonlinearity block for countervailing the strong static nonlinearities and a dynamic nonlinearity block for compensating the memory effects of RF PAs. The proposed predistorter adds extended cross‐terms of the leading terms and some lagging envelope terms in the dynamic nonlinearity block to compensate the memory effects of wide‐band RF PAs more effectively. A 460 MHz and a 1.94 GHz Doherty RF PA are utilised to validate the performance of the proposed predistorter when a three‐carrier wide‐band CDMA and a single‐carrier long‐term evaluation signal are applied separately. The validation results illustrate that the proposed GTBC‐H predistorter can further suppress the residual out‐of‐band emission over the augmented Hammerstein, the enhanced Hammerstein and the parallel‐LUT‐MP‐EMP predistorter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronics LettersSame topicAdvanced Power Amplifier DesignFrench-language works237,207