MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W23259838 · doi:10.1089/scd.2012.0323

A monolithic phase locked loop frequency synthesizer for a 0.5um CMOS process

2011· article· en· W23259838 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Praveen Reddy Parva

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cells and Development · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPhase-locked loopFrequency synthesizerLoop (graph theory)Process (computing)CMOSPhase (matter)Phase noiseOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceComputer scienceElectronic engineeringPhysicsEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Phase Locked Loop (PLL) frequency synthesizer is a closed loop high frequency generator, which employs a crystal oscillator with constant frequency. The reference signal (crystal) and the feedback signal are compared using a phase frequency detector (PFD). The filtered PFD output is subsequently fed to a voltage controlled oscillator (VCO), which generates the output frequency. In the ever increasing high performance (digital) systems, PLLs are frequently used to generate frequencies with high stability. This thesis will detail the design of a phase locked loop frequency synthesizer using the cadence design kit in conjunction with the ONSEMI 0.5um CMOS technology. All PLL units will be designed and simulated using the cadence design tool set available at ONSEMI. The Cadence tool has an embedded netlist generator, which will be used for this purpose. The netlist serves as a platform to simulate the design and the spectre waveform viewer will be employed to view the results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStem Cells and DevelopmentSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207