Sistematização da Assistência de Enfermagem Perioperatória em cirurgia da cavidade oral ambulatorial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMO: Objetivo: descrever a construção e a validação de protocolo de Sistematização da Assistência de Enfermagem Perioperatória (SAEP), aplicado à cirurgia oral menor no Centro de Especialidades Odontológicas, vinculado à uma instituição de ensino superior em Pernambuco.Método: relato de experiência no qual foram utilizados os Padrões Funcionais de Saúde de Gordon para coleta de dados, identificação dos Diagnósticos de Enfermagem segundo a Taxonomia NANDA -I e posterior validação com pacientes atendidos entre 2008 e 2009.Conclusão: O protocolo de SAEP proposto permitiu que o processo de Enfermagem na formação em nível de graduação não fosse apenas abordado sob o ponto de vista teórico.O relato dos estudantes extensionistas evidenciou a viabilidade e a eficácia da SAEP, além de suas vantagens sobre a qualidade da assistência e do processo de trabalho da Enfermagem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.036 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".