Optimal Design of a Postcombustion CO<sub>2</sub> Capture Pilot-Scale Plant under Process Uncertainty: A Ranking-Based Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents a study of the effect of process uncertainty on the optimal design of a CO 2 capture pilot-scale plant for coal-based power plants. The presented work employed a novel method in the optimal design of large-scale chemical processes (such as the CO 2 -capture plant) under uncertainty, which uses a power series expansion (PSE) approximation to the actual nonlinear process in computing the output distribution of the process constraints due to uncertainty. A ranking-based approach is employed here where priorities or probabilities of satisfaction are assigned to the process constraints considered in the analysis. In this work, uncertainty is assumed in three input variables affecting the operation of a CO 2 -capture pilot plant, namely, the CO 2 content and the temperature and flow rate of the flue gas stream. The design of the optimal plant aims to specify the sizes of the key process units included in the CO 2 -capture pilot plant, such as the packed column height and diameters and heat exchanger and condenser areas, that minimize the process economics in the presence of uncertainty in the flue-gas stream conditions. The results of the study using the proposed method show that, to ensure a desired target CO 2 removal rate in the presence of process uncertainties in the flue gas stream, larger designs for both the absorber and stripper towers and a higher reboiler heat duty are required. Although the present method yields larger and, thus, more expensive designs, it ensures that the environmental and operating constraints are satisfied according to the user-defined probability of satisfaction, whereas the original pilot-plant base-case design violates the target for the CO 2 removal rate most of the time when operating under uncertainty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".