MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326051152 · doi:10.1109/lmwc.2016.2516761

A Novel Dynamic Neuro-Space Mapping Approach for Nonlinear Microwave Device Modeling

2016· article· en· W2326051152 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemSpace mappingComputer scienceHigh-electron-mobility transistorElectronic engineeringResistorTransistorCapacitanceArtificial neural networkLimit (mathematics)Topology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringAlgorithmPhysicsEngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligenceVoltageMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter presents a novel dynamic Neuro-space mapping (Neuro-SM) technique for nonlinear device modeling. This is an advance over the existing static Neuro-SM which aims to map a given approximate device model towards an accurate model. The proposed technique retains the ability of static Neuro-SM in modifying the effects of nonlinear resistors and current sources. The proposed technique can also make up for any capacitive effects and non-quasi-static effects that maybe missing in the given model, which is not achievable by the existing static Neuro-SM. In this way, the dynamic Neuro-SM model can exceed the accuracy limit of the static Neuro-SM. The validity and efficiency of the proposed approach are verified through two high-electron mobility transistor (HEMT) modeling examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it