MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326082597 · doi:10.1021/bi101840j

Novel Hydrophobic Standards for Membrane Protein Molecular Weight Determinations via Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate−Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis

2010· article· en· W2326082597 on OpenAlexafffund
Arianna Rath, Vincent G. Nadeau, Bradley E. Poulsen, Derek P. Ng, Charles M. Deber

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company
KeywordsSodium dodecyl sulfatePolyacrylamide gel electrophoresisChemistryChromatographyGel electrophoresisMembrane proteinMembraneSodiumGel electrophoresis of proteinsBiochemistryOrganic chemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) is a universally employed technique that separates proteins on the basis of molecular weight (MW). However, membrane proteins are known to size anomalously on SDS-PAGE calibrated with conventional standards, an issue that complicates interpretation of protein identity, purity, degradation, and/or stoichiometry. Here we describe the preparation of novel polyleucine hydrophobic standards for SDS-PAGE that reduce the average deviation of the apparent MW from the formula MW of natural membrane proteins to 7% versus 20% with commercially available standards. Our results suggest that gel calibration with hydrophobic standards may facilitate the interpretation of membrane protein SDS-PAGE experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicLipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207