MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326099109 · doi:10.1139/p2012-095

Kinetic treatment for the exact solution of the unsteady Rayleigh flow problem of a rarefied homogeneous charged gas bounded by an oscillating plate

2012· article· en· W2326099109 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Taha Zakaraia Abdel Wahid, S.K. Elagan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsBoltzmann equationKinetic energyClassical mechanicsPlasmaElectronPlasma modelingKinetic theoryPlane (geometry)Rayleigh scatteringMechanicsThermodynamicsQuantum mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exact solution of the unsteady Rayleigh flow problem of a rarefied charged gas bounded by an oscillating plate has been made. For this purpose, we use the traveling wave solution method. The kinetic and the irreversible thermodynamic properties of the charged gas are presented from the molecular viewpoint. Our study is based on the solution of the Bhatnager–Gross–Krook (BGK) model of the Boltzmann kinetic equation, with the precision value of the electron–electron collision frequency. The BGK model equation coupled with Maxwell’s equations, for electron gas near an oscillating rigid plane, are solved. The distinction and comparisons between the perturbed and the equilibrium velocity distribution functions are illustrated. The ratios between the different contributions of the internal energy changes are predicted via the extended Gibbs equation for both diamagnetic and paramagnetic plasmas. The results are applied to a typical model of laboratory argon plasma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicGas Dynamics and Kinetic TheoryFrench-language works237,207