MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326108006 · doi:10.1021/ma400079q

Kinetics of Two-Stage Dispersion Copolymerization for the Preparation of Lanthanide-Encoded Polystyrene Microparticles

2013· article· en· W2326108006 on OpenAlexafffund
Taunia Closson, Chun Feng, Adrienne Halupa, Mitchell A. Winnik

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCopolymerDispersion polymerizationStyrenePolystyrenePolymer chemistryAcrylic acidKineticsDispersion (optics)MonomerParticle sizeChemistryLanthanidePolymerizationParticle (ecology)Materials scienceChemical engineeringIonOrganic chemistryPolymerPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To obtain a better understanding of how lanthanide-encoded polystyrene microbeads are formed during their synthesis, we carried out kinetic studies of two-stage dispersion copolymerization of styrene and acrylic acid (AA, 2 wt % based on styrene), with or without added TmCl 3, in ethanol in the presence of poly( N -vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) (PVP) as a polymeric stabilizer. Particles of narrow size distribution and micrometer diameters were obtained, allowing us to compare rates of monomer conversion, Tm ion incorporation, and growth in particle size. In these reactions, AA or (AA + TmCl 3 ) were added in a second stage ( t = 1 h). Much of the AA incorporation into the particles occurred in the latter half of the reaction. In the presence of small amounts of TmCl 3 there was some retardation of the polymerization reaction. The most striking result was that at the higher levels of TmCl 3 most of the metal ion incorporation occurred late in the reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207