MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326117247 · doi:10.1107/s0108767310096248

Lattice dynamics of multiferroic BiFeO<sub>3</sub>

2010· article· en· W2326117247 on OpenAlexaff
Elena Borissenko, Alexeï Bosak, P. Rovillain, M. Cazayous, Marco Goffinet, Philippe Ghosez, D. Colson, M. Krisch

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMultiferroics and related materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiferroicsCondensed matter physicsMaterials scienceLattice (music)Statistical physicsPhysicsFerroelectricityOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Page s167 s167 catalysts without any sintering effects or changes in the size distribution.However, changes of the microstructure of the gold nanoparticles can be induced by chemical and thermal treatment.The effect of the microstructure properties of gold nanoparticles on the catalytic activity for CO oxidation has been investigated.Line profile analysis of powder diffraction data based on Whole Powder Pattern Modelling (WPPM) approach was used to determine both the domain size distribution and lattice defects present in this two phase system [2].The different catalysts showed substantial variation in the activity towards CO oxidation depending on their microstructure.Lower dislocation densities and less stacking faults, but higher twin densities result in decreased catalytic activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of CrystallographySame topicMultiferroics and related materialsFrench-language works237,207