MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326123624 · doi:10.1097/med.0000000000000138

Polyunsaturated fatty acid–phospholipid remodeling and inflammation

2015· review· en· W2326123624 on OpenAlexafffund
Philippe Pierre Robichaud, Marc E. Surette

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Endocrinology Diabetes and Obesity · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPolyunsaturated fatty acidAcyltransferaseLipid signalingInflammationBiochemistryGlycerophospholipidsEnzymePhospholipidPhospholipase A2BiologyCell biologyChemistryFatty acidMembraneImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To highlight some of the recent advances related to the control of polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) incorporation and remodeling in membrane glycerophospholipids in inflammatory cells. RECENT FINDINGS: Several enzymes have recently been identified that are associated with the control of PUFA incorporation and remodeling into membrane phospholipids and their release. The functional roles of the different enzyme isotypes in the control of PUFA availability for lipid mediator biosynthesis and cell signaling are only now being established. The expression of specific acyl-CoA synthetase, lysophospholipid acyltransferase and phospholipase A2 isotypes has recently been shown to have an impact on membrane PUFA content, on the production of lipid mediators and on inflammation. SUMMARY: A better understanding of the complex processes associated with the control PUFA remodeling in membrane phospholipids may lead to the discovery of new therapeutic targets for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Endocrinology Diabetes and ObesitySame topicFatty Acid Research and HealthFrench-language works237,207