MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326152583 · doi:10.2514/6.2013-346

Characterization of DBD Plasma Actuators via PIV Measurements

2013· article· en· W2326152583 on OpenAlexaff
John P. Murphy, Philippe Lavoie

Bibliographic record

Venue51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasma actuatorPlasmaCharacterization (materials science)ActuatorMaterials scienceComputer scienceNanotechnologyPhysicsArtificial intelligenceDielectric barrier discharge

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents Particle Image Velocimetry measurements of the induced flow characteristics generated by single dielectric barrier discharge actuators in quiescent conditions. The primary aim is to establish accurate empirical trends for model development on both the maximum induced velocity and body force with voltage and consumed power. The results from this work reveal a power law variation for the maximum velocity at low voltages which is then followed by an asymptotic behaviour. In contrast, the body force is characterized by two power law regions. The power law exponent is a function of the dielectric thickness, frequency and dielectric constant. Reducing the former or increasing the latter two metrics result in a higher coefficient and lower voltage at which the trend changes. The onset of the second region coincides with an associated shift towards the wall in the downstream maximum velocity location. A small hysteresis effect has been established for the Kapton based actuators which is postulated to be associated with actuator degradation. The results from this study also reveal that a flush mounted exposed electrode leads to a thicker, less concentrated wall jet which, overall, produces the same body force as the non-flushed mounted configuration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace ExpositionSame topicPlasma and Flow Control in AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207