Experiences of disabled artists doing art in a community art centre
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT How adults with disabilities and health conditions experience creating art in a community art centre was explored in this qualitative study. Areas of interest included the influence of place on art making and art making on personal well-being. Eleven adults who regularly engaged in their own art at the Creative Spirit Art centre in Toronto, Canada were interviewed. Interviews were recorded and analysed thematically. Major themes were found: ‘presence in art’; ‘a culture for expression’; and ‘personal benefits’. Participants described how they were present with their art, which emphasized a sense of awareness while they were creating their art. They described how the relationship between the environment and personal energies influenced their art and sense of being valued and respected as artists. The findings from this study contribute to the power that art making in an enabling, supportive community setting as a valued activity influences identity, mindful occupational engagement and the well-being of individuals with disability and health conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it