Mirroring Enzymes: The Role of Hydrogen Bonding in an Asymmetric Organocatalyzed Aza-Henry Reaction—a DFT Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mechanism of the HQuin-BAM ( 1 ) catalyzed aza-Henry reaction between nitromethane and N -Boc-phenylaldimine was studied using density functional theory (DFT). Deprotonation of nitromethane by the catalyst was revealed to be the rate-limiting step, and C···C bond formation was found to be enantio-determining. The catalyst, in addition to acting as a Brønsted base, served to simultaneously activate both the electrophile and the nucleophile through hydrogen bonding during C···C bond formation and is thus essential for both reaction rate and selectivity. Analysis of the hydrogen bonding interactions revealed that there was a strong preference for the formation of a homonuclear positive-charge-assisted hydrogen bond (homonuclear (+)CAHB), which in turn governed the relative orientation of substrate binding. Furthermore, a direct correlation between the dihedral angle (θ NCCN ) of the reacting substrates and facial selectivity was found. This relationship between θ and facial selectivity was found to be a consequence of optimal secondary interactions and orbital overlap.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".