MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326286923 · doi:10.1177/0049085715619496

The Policy Shop: Innovation, Partnerships and Capacity-building

2016· article· en· W2326286923 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sara McPhee-Knowles, William P. Boland

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Change · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCommunity Development and Social Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)BusinessAccountabilityWork (physics)Private sectorPublic policyPublic sectorSpace (punctuation)Service delivery frameworkService (business)Public administrationPublic relationsMarketingEconomic growthEconomicsEngineeringPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, the Canadian federal government has moved to an alternative service delivery model where the third sector has been increasingly called on to fill the gaps in government service delivery. However, these organisations suffer from tight budgets and burdensome accountability measures, and generally they do not have resources to undertake policy work. New organisations that promote innovation in the third sector are needed to fill this gap, so the Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, located in Saskatoon, developed the Policy Shop, a student-run, pro-bono policy consultancy, to meet the needs of the third-sector organisations in the policy space. Organisations like the Policy Shop serve as innovation brokers and link third-sector organisations to the university–industry–government Triple Helix network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0080.022
Scholarly communication0.0210.020
Open science0.0030.014
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.348
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.035 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial ChangeSame topicCommunity Development and Social ImpactFrench-language works237,207