Phenylcyanamide Ligand Control of Photo-Induced Linkage Isomerism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The photo- and electrochemically induced linkage isomerism of six new complexes [Ru(bpy)2(L)(dmso-S)](+), where dmso is dimethylsulfoxide, bpy is 2,2'-bipyridine, and L(-) is pentachloro-, 2,3,5,6-tetrachloro-, 2,4,5-trichloro-, 2,4-dichloro-, 4-chloro-, and unsubstituted phenylcyanamide anion, were investigated. The quantum yields of linkage isomerism forming the metastable [Ru(bpy)2(L)(dmso-O)](+) complexes are shown to decrease with increasing donor properties of the phenylcyanamide ligand, and it is suggested that the donor properties of the cyanamide ligand stabilize the [Ru(bpy)2(L)(dmso-S)](+) complexes in the (3)MLCT excited state. The cyclic voltammetry of these complexes showed two oxidation processes: a phenylcyanamide L(0/-) couple (an assignment supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations) and a Ru(III/II) couple at more positive potential. Upon oxidation to Ru(III), the complexes rearranged to form Ru-O linkage isomers, and the scan rate dependent voltammograms permitted estimates of the rates of linkage isomerism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".