Impact of a Picolinate Ancillary Ligand on Phosphorescence and Fluoride Sensing Properties of BMes<sub>2</sub>-Functionalized Platinum(II) Compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two new dimesitylboron (BMes 2 )-functionalized 2-phenylpyridine cyclometalated Pt(II) complexes ( 2 and 3 ) with a picolinate or a methyl-picolinate as the ancillary ligand have been synthesized via a one-pot procedure at ambient conditions with high yields (>70%). The crystal structures of these Pt(II) complexes were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis, which revealed the presence of extended π-stacking interactions in the crystal lattice of 2 and discrete dimer formation in the lattice of 3 . Both complexes exhibit dual phosphorescence emission in solution at room temperature under N 2 atmosphere. These unusual photophysical properties have been systematically investigated by spectroscopic and computational studies, which established that the phosphorescent dual emission originates from admixture of 3 LLCT and 3 ILCT/ 3 MLCT transitions. Fluoride titration experiments were conducted to further confirm the origin of phosphorescence in these compounds. The phosphorescent properties and the phosphorescent response toward fluoride ions by compounds 2 and 3 are distinctly different from the previously known BMes 2 -functionalized N ∧ C-chelate Pt(II) compounds, which are attributed to the introduction of the low-lying π* orbital by the picolinate ancillary ligand in the Pt(II) compounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".