MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326311032 · doi:10.1061/40862(194)47

Finite Element Modelling of Upheaval Buckling of Buried offshore Pipelines in Clayey Soils

2006· article· en· W2326311032 on OpenAlexaff
Tim Newson, Porang Deljoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbedmentPipeline transportSubmarine pipelineGeotechnical engineeringBucklingFinite element methodGeologyStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Offshore oil and gas pipelines are often buried to provide environmental stability and protection. Many of these pipes are prone to upheaval buckling and trenches are backfilled to provide soil restraint for the pipelines to resist uplift forces. Soil failure mechanisms can extend to the surface (shallow) or remain in the soil body (deep); the exact conditions that cause this transition are currently unclear. A parametric study of pipeline upheaval buckling in clays has been conducted using the finite element analysis. Mechanisms of failure and pullout forces were investigated for immediate breakaway and fully bonded conditions for undrained rough pipelines. The results indicate that uplift factors (Nc) are similar to those found for plate anchors, with values approximately 4.5 to 6.5%) greater for the pipelines. The critical normalised embedment depths (H/D) for the transition from shallow to deep mechanisms occur between 5 to 6 for both anchors and pipelines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207