MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2326431845 · doi:10.1061/9780784412473.066

Multi-Criteria Analysis with Geographic Information Systems in Changing Permafrost Environments: Opportunities and Limits

2012· article· en· W2326431845 on OpenAlexaffabout
Katerine Grandmont, Daniel Fortier, Jeffrey A. Cardille

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité LavalCenter for Northern Studies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostGeographic information systemEnvironmental resource managementTerrainRelocationContext (archaeology)Land useEnvironmental planningEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingComputer scienceCivil engineeringGeographyGeologyEngineeringCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For northern regions underlain by permafrost, the projected increase in temperatures will greatly impact the physical properties of soils and their capacity to support infrastructure. In this context, the need to identify land parcels to build new housing in a safe and sustainable manner is pressing in Nunavik (northern Quebec, Canada). To guide residential development in these particular settings, this paper presents a GIS-based approach developed to identify terrain sensitivity to thaw-settlement and mass movements, geomorphological processes responsible for costly readaptation or relocation of infrastructure. Land-suitability assessment for residential development in permafrost regions requires the consideration of many factors that may interact in complex ways. Combining factors to assess suitability presents a number of challenges that are especially important to resolve in permafrost-region studies to guide fine-scale decisions. Using an example of a GIS system built for the village of Tasiujaq in Nunavik, this paper illustrates some of the specific challenges to the effective use of GIS for management in permafrost regions. Temporal, existential and representational limits are inherent to the use of GIS and important to consider in land planning for permafrost studies. This paper also demonstrates how permafrost science can benefit from GIS technologies, especially their capacity of adaptation and transformation to any scenarios and changes in environmental parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→