MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326451245 · doi:10.2741/491

Mitochondrial DNA related cardiomyopathies

2011· review· en· W2326451245 on OpenAlex
Shamayel Mohammed

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Bioscience-Elite · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsMitochondrial DNACardiomyopathyMitochondrionPhenotypeGeneticsBiologyNuclear DNAOxidative phosphorylationMedicineBioinformaticsGeneInternal medicineHeart failureBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiomyopathies are a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by impaired heart muscle function. Over the last few years, interest in mitochondrial cardiomyopathies has been galvanized by a number of significant molecular biology discoveries. There is overwhelming evidence that genetic factors play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of primary cardiomyopathies. Mitochondrial cardiomyopathy is a cardiomyopathy in which the clinical and pathological phenotype result from mitochondrial diseases due to pathogenic mutation in both mitochondrial and/or nuclear genes causing defects in the oxidative phosphorylation system (OXPHOS) in cardiac muscle. We review and provide an update of the current concepts, molecular genetics, clinical features, pathology, diagnostic modalities, and latest therapeutic options in mitochondrial cardiomyopathies specifically caused by mutations in the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it