Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor of the Orbit in Adults: A Case Series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To present the clinical, radiologic, and histopathologic features of orbital primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) in 5 adult patients. METHODS: Retrospective case series of 5 adult patients with orbital PNET. Orbitotomy was performed in all cases. The authors report clinical findings, radiologic features, histopathology, immunohistochemical analysis, management, and outcomes for 5 patients with orbital PNET. RESULTS: Five adult patients presented with progressive unilateral proptosis and visual impairment. Common radiographic findings included a heterogeneous mass without associated destructive features, located in the superior and/or lateral orbit. Four cases demonstrated strong immunohistochemical staining for CD99 in a membranous pattern. One case required chromosomal analysis with fluorescence in situ hybridization to confirm the diagnosis. All patients received chemotherapy and/or orbital radiation with resolution of proptosis but no improvement of vision. One patient died of disease. CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the largest series of orbital PNET in adults. This tumor has an age demographic wider than previously believed and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a hypercellular small round cell orbital tumor in both children and adults. Current treatment regimens are not standardized but typically use a similar approach to the treatment of Ewing sarcoma. Orbital PNET appears to have less propensity for metastasis compared with PNET in other locations. However, long-term aggressiveness remains to be proven.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".